23 hours ago
my attempt to do the exercises in sicp.
Monday, July 7, 2008
sicp exercise 2.4
; Exercise 2.4. Here is an alternative procedural representation of pairs. For this representation,
; verify that (car (cons x y)) yields x for any objects x and y.
; (define (cons x y)
; (lambda (m) (m x y)))
; (define (car z)
; (z (lambda (p q) p)))
; What is the corresponding definition of cdr? (Hint: To verify that this works, make use of the
; substitution model of section 1.1.5.)
(begin
(define (cons x y)
(lambda (m) (m x y)))
(define (car z)
(z (lambda (p q) p)))
(define (cdr z)
(z (lambda (p q) q)))
(display (car (cons 2 3))) (newline)
(display (cdr (cons 2 3))) (newline)
)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment